Organizational Structures Essay

Organizations intimacy in varied ways. Each organization is unique in its own accord and its everyplaceall endeavor depends on two main criteria coordination and communication. No matter what structure an organization chooses, the ultimate result is to get to coordination between units and communicate effectively for proper decision making and implementation. The current buzz word organism the networked economy and organizations, many firms atomic number 18 becoming more sophisticated and evolving into more interconnected entities than ever before.It is outstanding however to note that not one single structure is the most successful one. A firms reach at a decision to adopt a certain structure entails careful analysis of the requirements of the manufacture it operates in. Then only can it decide which structure suits it best. Dell, based in the US, is a truly spherical organization. With lead times of delivery ranging in days across the globe, Dell had no choice still to ad apt a structure which complimented its nimble and lean supply chain.This resulted in them adopting a networked structure as opposed to more traditional functional setup. The main criterion is not coordination here, but the proper take of communication which are necessary to deliver in editionation is the cheapest, fastest and most reliable way. Moreover, product manners cycles of Dell are shorter than most former(a) products and this again meant a quick supply chain okay by the most efficient communications strategy. Dell has been able to adopt this structure quicker and has giving to an extent which many never expected it to achieve (Sviokla, 2004).Dell does have departments and functions like any other organizations its the method by which they operate which is different. Each function is coordinated and communicates to achieve one primal goal deliver the good to the customer in the shortest time realistic. By having a networked organization, information travels at nearly th e speed of light and decisions are thus made in a shorter time. This is what Dell need to stay on top of its competition in the PC industry and thus, it adopted the best possible structure within the industry. Toyota, based in Japan, is a name of reliability.Their automobiles are well known for personify effectiveness and long life. All this was only achieved by the top notch structure that Toyota eventually evolved into over its long history. The work at Toyota is done by divisions teams of individuals in each function operating on assembly lines to produce cars. This along with a just in time inventory approach has enabled Toyota to go a truly global automobile maker and trendsetter in the industry. Till Toyota adopted it, JIT was something that many, especially in the automobile industry, wouldnt dare to emulate.Toyota realized how its inventory, being huge and with long lead times would oppose up work space and result in huge costs due to rental, obsolescence etc. gum oliba num Toyota did what Dell did but in a different manner, let the supplier remain the owner of the materials until they are needed. This called for not just a good communications setup but an exceptional coordinated sweat by the firms various functions as well. A delay in one function meant a staunch in the whole firm as each is dependent on the other.Thus Toyota needed a structure which was stable, coordinated and yet, able to communicate well with its suppliers as well as dealers. This came in the form of an organization which was capable of dissipating knowledge throughout its firm effectively and acts upon decisions made quickly (Choo, 2002). This means that Toyota is a matrix organization rather than a functional one which one might think it is at first glance. Secondly, it various factories internationally could be seen as SBUs (Strategic Business Units) working autonomously yet wish to a central point.Referencehttp//www.analytictech.com/mb021/orgtheory.htm